Karl Poper vs Thomas Kuhn essays

Karl Poper vs Thomas Kuhn essays Science can be defined as knowledge and theory on the nature and operation the universe and all things in it, in which facts are organized into a systematic and meaningful pattern developed as a result of experiments, observations, tests and many other methods it uses. The relationship between philosophy and science is that science is the way that how the humans organize their knowledge. At that point these two intersects. Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn are two philosophers that are discussed in this essay. The main question of that discussion is whether there is scientific progress or not. Karl Poppers answer is yes, while Thomas Kuhns is no (for overall). This two opposing sides will be examined in detail in the essay. Scientific realists versus anti-realists, theory of Karl Popper, theory of Thomas Kuhn and a counter claim that comes against Thomas Kuhn is discussed respectively in the paper. In order to explain, judge about the given quotation better, and understand Karl Poppers and Thomas Kuhns views and comparing those two; the definitions of scientific realism and anti-realism should be clarified. Scientific realism is a view that reflects the truth and helps humans living on the earth to explain or understand what is going on around them in the world. Realism gives a better understanding of the world, because it makes the people become aware of things more clearly. Take the E = m * c2 equation as an example. It tells the speed of light and its relations with m and c. It provides knowledge about the real world, and people use that theory. Such scientific equations and theories give something real about the world, and tell the real facts, and what the world really is. Furthermore, according to realism, science displays a process of discovery which means scientists deal with the things that already exist and one can discover those existing things that have not been rea...