Jackson Pollock and Modern Art Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

capital of Mississippi pollack and Modern craft - Essay ExampleThe essay Jackson pollock and Modern Art explores the art of Jackson Pollock and his impact in the context of Modern Art. He was a roughshod, ill-mannered, prodigiously ambitious, aggressive, alcoholic, tormented artist . This image is important to an interpretation of the evidently chaotic nature of much of Pollocks works, and the technique that led to them. However, as is often the case with creative artists of all sorts, and particularly tonalityers such(prenominal) as Pollock, there was a method to his madness. As Toynton has pointed out, films of Pollock creating his motion pictures clearly show that even the approximately abstract of them start as figurative works and only move into the abstract as they develop.Pollock travel his sheet from the easel to the floor, thus enabling him to work on much larger tabloides with greater ease than before, and as well to see them from multiple points of view. In one re vealing statement he talked about his technique and why he used it My painting does not come from the easel. I hardly ever stretch the canvas before painting. I prefer to tack the unstretched canvas to the hard wall or the floor. I fate the resistance of a hard surface. On the floor I am more at ease. I feel ne arer, more part of the painting, since this way I can walk around it, work from the quaternary sides and literally be in the painting. It is interesting to note that Pollock takes an intense and yet casual come up to his painting. Thus the fact that he does not go through the often laborious process. of stretching the canvas before painting on it, but rather merely tacking it to a wall or floor illustrates the casual, almost primitive method of preparation. At the same time Pollock becomes more intensely involved with the painting, as if he were actually a part of itI continue to get farther away from the usual painters tools such as easel, palette, brushes, etc. I prefer sticks, trowels, knives and dripping fluid paint or a heavy impasto with sand, broken glass or other foreign matter added. When I am in my painting, Im not aware of what Im doing. It is only after a sort of get acquainted period that I see what I have been about. I have no fear of making changes, destroying the image, etc., because the painting has a life of its own. I try to let it come through. It is only when I lose contact with the painting that the result is a mess. Otherwise there is pure harmony, an easy give and take, and the painting comes out well. (Varnedoe, 23) The paper of being in the painting is of course hardly new to Pollock, but the fact that his technique apparently fitted into his emotional and intellectual attachment to the painting is. His physical technique standing on and thus at bottom the painting, had a profound effect some(prenominal) upon his creations and upon generations of creative artists in general and painters in particular, for years both durin g and after his lifetime. Pollock hinted, although never explicitly stated, that he was influenced by Native American sand paintings, which are made by trickling thin lines of colored sand onto a flat surface. After WWII, in 1947 Pollock began what he called his action paintings, which were at least partially informed by the surrealist ideas of psychic automatism. This automatism was meant to be a direct expression of the unconscious. A direct expression of something which is, by definition, unknowable to the conscious mind efficiency seem a